Translation Page | USAComment.com
USAComment.com
Zicutake USA Comment | Search Articles










Zicutake Formation University:

USAComment.com | Search Articles of Onion.to
Search Articles of Onion.to:

Shorten that long URL into a tiny URL:
Example, enter the url: http://zicutake.usacomment.com = Tinyurl.com/hox5dyn
USAComment.com
THE PIRATE BAY | Search Download





Tweets by Zicutake


Friday, January 5, 2018

#Funny News

#Funny News


Original Comey Memo Released. It Exposes Major Hillary Corruption…

Posted: 04 Jan 2018 06:03 PM PST

Original Comey memo

Remember the thunderous crapstorm that was the Clinton email investigation? It’s still unfolding. Today James Comey’s original Clinton memo was released to the public. It was originally meant to explain what he found when investigating Hillary, but ended up being heavily edited. Scrubbed of any pesky statements detailing the corrupt habits of Her Haggardness. Possibly to protect her political career. And by “possibly” I mean most definitely.

But feel free to take a peek for yourself and draw your own conclusions.

Ex-FBI Director James Comey's original statement closing out the probe into Hillary Clinton‘s use of a private email server was edited by subordinates to remove five separate references to terms like "grossly negligent" and to delete mention of evidence supporting felony and misdemeanor violations, according to copies of the full document.

Comey also originally concluded that it was "reasonably likely" that Clinton's nonsecure private server was accessed or hacked by hostile actors though there was no evidence to prove it. But that passage was also changed to the much weaker "possible," the memos show.

The full draft and edits were released on the website of Senate Homeland and Government Affairs Committee Chairman Ron Johnson (R-Wis.), providing the most complete public accounting to date of Comey's draft and the subsequent edits.

The draft, released in full for the first time on Thursday, offers new details on the FBI’s Clinton investigation and controversial conclusion.

What it means? The FBI was catching onto Hillary’s cauldron brewing ways “gross negligence.” Alas, the weakest FBI officials fell victim to her political sway. A hex perhaps. Either way, the crooked crone was free to continue her (failed) election journey. Her flying monkeys mopping up her mess all the while.

"The edits to Director Comey's public statement, made months prior to the conclusion of the FBI's investigation of Secretary Clinton's conduct, had a significant impact on the FBI's public evaluation of the implications of her actions," Johnson wrote, noting recently released text messages show some senior FBI officials involved in the case harbored political hatred for Trump or preference for Clinton.

One edit that concerned Johnson was a decision to delete from Comey's original draft a reference to the FBI working on a joint assessment with the intelligence community about possible national security damage from the classified information that passed through Clinton's nonsecure email servers.

"We have done extensive work with the assistance of our colleagues elsewhere in the Intelligence Community to understand what indications there might be of compromise by hostile actors in connection with the private email operation," Comey originally wrote.

Johnson goes on to question the FBI’s role “and possible interference” in the 2016 election. Rightly so. Clinton had many government officials in her withered clutches (see CORRUPT: Judge Rules to Keep Hillary Emails Hidden From Voters Until AFTER Election Day). This memo just confirms it.

Lady Clinton may have been melted by the 2016 election. But new information like this continues to prove the corrupt web which protected her runs deep (see FBI, DOJ Wanted to Investigate Hillary. Comey and Lynch Intervened…). Time to purge.

Now for a recap on the pantsuited bullet we dodged.

NOT SUBSCRIBED TO THE PODCAST? FIX THAT! IT'S COMPLETELY FREE ON BOTH ITUNES HERE AND SOUNDCLOUD HERE

CONSEQUENCES: Fed Up Police Ditch Berkeley. Their Reason…

Posted: 04 Jan 2018 03:22 PM PST

Protip: when you malign the police, they leave. Then bad things happen. See Baltimore’s Crime Now Skyrockets Past Detroit After City Reins in Police… and Baltimore Rioters Now Want Back The Police They Hated. This is a lesson Berkeley is currently learning. After all the riots, protests, and tantrums, Berkeley’s bottom is in need of a spanking from the swift hand of justice. But while the city lends support to groups with anti-cop sentiment, they minimize police resources. Not a good mix.

Surprise, surprise. It’s beginning to backfire on them.

Berkeley police staffing is reportedly at a “crisis point.” Courtesy of wheresmyberkeleycop.com:

In 1999, Berkeley had 215 cops on the beat. Soon the city may have fewer than 140 officers to answer calls for service. But while the number of cops has gone down, Berkeley's population has gone up – from 108,000 in 1999 to 121,000 today.

The math is simple. 12% more residents + 35% fewer cops = slower response times and serious consequences for public safety.

Every police department in the country is affected by anti-law enforcement sentiment and Berkeley PD is no different. The national climate influences local elected officials and affects the support they give to the police. Just this year, twenty six officers have left the department for other opportunities and more are on their way out.

The campaign also points out how the police department’s resources keep getting depleted. All while the city continues to devolve into a crapstorm (see BACK TO BERKELEY: Antifa Swarms Trump Supporters in Violent Attack and ‘Anti-Fascists’ Burn Berkeley to Protest Milo. They’re The REAL Fascists!).

Let’s recap. Berkeley has been entertaining anti-cop rhetoric. Not only are police receiving less support from city officials, they’ve been stripped of the tools they need to keep people (and themselves) safe. When you beat down someone’s morale for doing their job AND refuse to give them the resources they need to do their job? Yeah, they’re going to peace out.

Can’t say I blame them.

NOT SUBSCRIBED TO THE PODCAST? FIX THAT! IT'S COMPLETELY FREE ON BOTH ITUNES HERE AND SOUNDCLOUD HERE.

Pew Research Finds American Muslim Numbers Are Growing. QUICKLY…

Posted: 04 Jan 2018 02:39 PM PST

Muslim American Population Grows

Pew Research always has some mind titillating factoids. For instance, American Muslims were busy last year. As 2017 wound to a close, so did some interesting studies. The U.S. Muslim population is projected to surpass the Jewish population by 2040 and double by 2050:

…Our projections suggest that the U.S. Muslim population will grow much faster than the country's Jewish population. By 2040, Muslims will replace Jews as the nation's second-largest religious group after Christians. And by 2050, the U.S. Muslim population is projected to reach 8.1 million, or 2.1% of the nation's total population — nearly twice the share of today.

Where are the Muslim populations sprouting from? Fresh start seekers and fruitful loins.

The latest estimate combines information from our 2017 survey of U.S. Muslims — which reported on the prevalence of Muslims among immigrants and other demographic groups — with official Census Bureau data on the number of people in these groups.

… the Muslim population has continued to grow at a rate of roughly 100,000 per year, driven both by higher fertility rates among Muslim Americans as well as the continued migration of Muslims to the U.S.

What’s not affecting the numbers? Conversions.

Religious conversions haven't had a large impact on the size of the U.S. Muslim population, largely because about as many Americans convert to Islam as leave the faith.

Meanwhile, the rest of Americans are drooling at Netflix instead of getting busy in beddy bye. Birthrates are alarmingly low, 62 babies per every 1,000 fertile women. Come on, folks, making babies is the most fun part of being human.

A nifty summary: Muslims are moving to the U.S., having more kids than everyone else by comparison, and not leaving their faith. Looking on a wide scale, like worldwide, Muslims are outpacing Christians in birthing youngins. According to Pew Research, in the next 20 years, Muslims will surpass Christians in laboring little beings into the world.

This is bound to cause a shift of values in both America and for neighboring earth dwellers. Christians value women’s equality, compassion toward all people, and free will. Muslims value putting tents on their women, throwing gays from rooftops, and living by strict Sharia law. No alcohol or merriment for you.

Globally, societies built on Muslim values are more apt to be oppressive to minorities, like ladies and men who have loose wrists. Countries built on Christianity are focused on social freedoms and have a lot less stabby tendencies. Just some thoughts to chew like Hubba Bubba.

If you’re an information freak who wants to know important stuff about the Koran, look no further:

NOT SUBSCRIBED TO THE PODCAST? FIX THAT! IT'S COMPLETELY FREE ON BOTH ITUNES HERE AND SOUNDCLOUD HERE.

WATCH: College Students Support Infanticide Up Until TWO YEARS OLD

Posted: 04 Jan 2018 12:13 PM PST

Last year we thought we’d seen the height of evil when it came to abortion. But 2018 has come knocking, coat hanger in hand. Apparently the abortion movement is now hungry for post-natal flesh. Here’s a video of a college student making the case for infanticide. Because killing fetuses is so 2017. Time to move on to the pesky neonates!

Students for Life of America's Appalachian Regional Coordinator, Brenna Lewis, recorded an encounter with a pro-choice student, who sought to justify his support for infanticide of two-year-olds. The student attends University of Tennessee, Knoxville.

The student claimed that because a two-year-old may not be sentient, that the two-year-old baby does not have the same right to life. He also compared its rights to that of a tree. Because the baby cannot talk, for example, the student argued that it did not have the same rights.

This isn’t coming from some basement-dwelling fringe group. Such noxious notions are prevalent on campus. If anyone’s going to justify the snuffing of young tots, it’s college students. They suffer under the heft of leftist indoctrination. This blabbing comes as zero surprise considering the anti-child climate being fostered by liberal academics. Just take a gander at the gaseous claptrap erupting from scholarly cryholes. The following comes courtesy of a medical ethics paper, which you can read in full here.

The moral status of an infant is equivalent to that of a fetus, that is, neither can be considered a 'person' in a morally relevant sense.

It is not possible to damage a newborn by preventing her from developing the potentiality to become a person in the morally relevant sense.

It’s all beginning to make sense now. Leftists are giant, babylike fleshloaves themselves. They demand to be taken care of. Naturally, that makes actual babies their competition. THERE CAN BE ONLY ONE!

And here I thought things couldn’t get more stupidly depraved than this: Monster of the Year Lena Dunham Wishes She Had An Abortion. Silly me.

Killing toddlers is kind of why we have a problem with the entire “Well, but is it SENTIENT!?” argument held by “compassionate” leftists.

Observe, leftist progress in action.

NOT SUBSCRIBED TO THE PODCAST? FIX THAT! IT'S COMPLETELY FREE ON BOTH ITUNES HERE AND SOUNDCLOUD HERE.

YouTube Demonetized Dave Rubin Interview with Ben Shapiro

Posted: 04 Jan 2018 12:04 PM PST

What’s more threatening to Planet Earth than Literally Hitler and global warming? For YouTube, it’s conservative voices like Ben Shapiro. That menacing titan standing no taller than five foot doesn’t matter, continued his rabble-rousing antics by conducting a reasonable discussion without even raising his voice or either of his scary eyebrows. Our favorite yarmulke-sporting Jew recently sat down with Dave Rubin to discuss all things 2018 like transgenderism, Trump, and Star Wars. Burn them at the stake.

YouTube demonetized the video in its first 24 hours, crippling the video’s chance of making a buck. First, that video:

If you’ve spent a modicum of time on the YouTuben, you’re aware of some questionable content which is never flagged as “unfriendly for advertisers.” Not least of which is fictional (or real) depiction of murder. But a Jew and a gay man sit down for a friendly conversation about the issues of 2018:

This is the same YouTube who’s not only demonetized but restricted the videos from PragerU. Videos tame enough to get a G-rating, friendly enough to show ahead of a Pixar film about happy clouds.

Being a creator is fine, Dave. If you have the proper mindset. Get your self to a re-education camp to sort this all out. Snell.

Dave tried clarifying his mission for 2018 with a follow-up video… which YouTube demonetized faster than a feminist at a cake-eating contest.

We’re familiar with Dave’s battle:

The reason the left wants to ban “hate speech” is the same reason they want to silence conservatives. The left cannot tolerate views which challenge their own. “Hate speech” is simply code for “that which I cannot argue, ergo it must be silenced.” Like having a friendly conversation about gender pronouns.

Leftism cannot survive scrutiny. It’s based primarily on feelings, identity politics, and whatever pet cause the DNC has designated each day, faxed to their drones nation-wide. As soon as anyone dares question the leftist narrative:

Get in line. Or don’t get paid.

NOT SUBSCRIBED TO THE PODCAST? FIX THAT! IT'S COMPLETELY FREE ON BOTH ITUNES HERE AND SOUNDCLOUD HERE.

Theresa May Forced to Apologize to Patients for Overcrowded Failings of NHS

Posted: 04 Jan 2018 11:10 AM PST

Theresa May Talks NHS Failings

Imagine, for a moment, you’re a skinny, soft, beta-male European. You’ve been sitting on your buttocks for the last two weeks in bone cracking pain. There’s a puss-filled mass on your spine. So at least you’re not completely spineless. The mass is benign but more painful than watching Lena Dunham eat cake while on a toilet. Ugh. The NHS won’t operate. Something about hospitals being filled to capacity. Better luck next time, sweet cheeks.

Prime Minister Theresa May was forced to apologize to patients after their operations were canceled due to NHS failings:

Earlier this week, officials at the National Health Service (NHS) in England recommended that hospitals cancel all non-urgent appointments and operations until next month. A flu outbreak, colder weather and high levels of respiratory illnesses have put hospitals in England under strain with many operating at or near full capacity.

Pause. Having the flu isn’t a valid reason to visit the doctor. I see why hospitals are full. A good reason to see a doctor or go to an ER is falling down the stairs. Slashing your fleshy scalp on your brother’s mounted sword collection. Your skin flapping in the breeze as you cruise to the ER in your convertible.

The NHS, which delivers free care for all and accounts for a third of government spending on public services, is typically one of the most important issues for voters during elections and one which is often regarded as a weakness for May's Conservative party.

Opposition parties regularly accuse the government of failing to adequately fund the health service.

One London-based doctor wrote that conditions were so bad that he was practicing "battlefield medicine", while another apologized for the "3rd world conditions" caused by overcrowding.

Conservative Theresa May had to apologize for the failings of a program she’s been trying to cut? Sounds about right. Progressives want to blame a lack of funding for the overcrowding. Nay, studies show people tend to use things in excess when they’re free. Which is why people are going to the doctor for the flu, crowding out people who actually need to be seen by a doctor.

Letting the government decide all the healthcare things lead to “battlefield conditions.” If healthcare was covered privately, and people saw the doctor when they needed to, overcrowding would level off and remedy itself.

Don’t believe me about those abhorrent waiting lists? Watch Canada muck it up:

NOT SUBSCRIBED TO THE PODCAST? FIX THAT! IT'S COMPLETELY FREE ON BOTH ITUNES HERE AND SOUNDCLOUD HERE.

Sarah Sanders ROASTS Nancy Pelosi on Tax Cut ‘Armageddon’

Posted: 04 Jan 2018 09:36 AM PST

Sanders and Pelosi

The northeast is being hit by a snowstorm called the Bomb Cyclone. I actually saw Bomb Cyclone open for Snow Patrol in 2001, but that’s not important right now. What’s important is this Sarah Huckabee Sanders burn against Nancy Pelosi is so hot…

anchorman

It is so hot, if you hold this tweet in front of you, you can melt your way to your car. That has probably been plowed in.

Sarah Sanders just rolled up Nancy Pelosi in facts (see Thanks Tax Cuts! Southwest Just Announced Huge Employee Bonuses and Deregulations Allow Economy to Boom Under ‘Trump Effect’ Economics…). And smoked her with a bag of Cheetos and a diet Mountain Dew. In other words, Thursday.

Maybe Pelosi just still isn’t “Armageddon it.” (I can’t be the only Def Leppard fan who gets the song stuck in his head when leftists open up their Armageddon pie hole)

Let Steve Moore explain:

The world economy is as strong today as it has been in at least a decade, as The Wall Street Journal recently reported. Now the left has to engage in logical contortions to explain how the red-hot American economy is really a result of Obama policies — every which one Trump has systematically been dismantling. As I've acknowledged many times, the roaring stock market and the surging rate of growth of the economy (which is now estimated at 3.5 percent, up from 1.6 percent in Obama's last year in office) could turn against Trump in the months and years to come. It's quite possible that the market exuberance over Trump's deregulation and tax cut policies have run too far ahead.

But what is certain at this point in Trump’s presidency is that anyone who sold stock on the basis of predictions by liberal “experts” such as Larry Summers, Paul Krugman and Steve Rattner missed out on a 30 percent-plus surge in their financial wealth. Would you take financial advice from these people?

No, I wouldn’t. I especially wouldn’t take financial advice from Botox Bertha. Or advice period. Except for advice on how to suck the life out of human souls. If that’s what I was into.

Did Democrats not read the Chicken Little story as a post-birth fetuses? You can only cry about the sky falling so much before people call you a shithead. See also: The Cis-Boy Who Cried Wolf.

Here’s how the left reacts to everything:

ObamaCare repeal: You’re all gonna die.

Net Neutrality repeal: Death in the streets.

Tax reform:

throat death

Yet, everyday people are waking up. Despite Democrats promising their untimely deaths due to a tax cut. Traffic is still flowing through metropolises. Despite Democrats alleging mass starvation due to (pick a law we haven’t already mentioned). People can, in fact, live and breathe without Democrats dictating the process.

It’s fair to show displeasure at an agenda you’re not keen on. We’re not saying people can’t flip out over a policy. But to hit the accelerator and say “LITERALLY DEATH!” when country club elites in DC vote yay or nay is borderline psychotic.

NOT SUBSCRIBED TO THE PODCAST? FIX THAT! IT'S COMPLETELY FREE ON BOTH ITUNES HERE AND SOUNDCLOUD HERE.

Bird-Brained Liberal Professor Demands Counseling for Students Suffering from Microaggressions…

Posted: 04 Jan 2018 09:01 AM PST

Counseling for Microaggressions

America’s late teens are being nursed into “grown-ups” by caregivers who water them with toxic leftist ideals. Welcome to college, where leftist fantasy lands dawn the flags of social justice. Like this woman. A professor suggested her students become professional victims. By pushing counseling for “invisible microaggressions.” She even did a cute study on it using 18 self-loathing individuals:

Microaggressions can include many "brief and common" perceived insults or slights, according to Vaccaro—who, as Campus Reform reported last August, coined the term "invisibility microaggressions" to describe when students of color "feel invisible."

Perceived insults or slights. A.k.a. sarcasm, humor, or the mental constructions implemented by people desperate for victimhood.

"Kim, who described herself as introverted, found it easier to say nothing and retreat to the comfort of home where she could cry it out," Vaccaro writes, adding that Kim, an Asian student, told her that "It's so easy to just want to retreat, and…just be like 'I don't think I want to do this anymore.' It's just easier to go home."

"If they piss me off one time, that's it, I'm not going to come back," said Sharon, on how she deals with professors and faculty members she feels are microaggressive.

To address the "pervasive racial microaggressions" that students face, Vaccaro recommends several strategies colleges can use to help, including more counseling services for students of color…”

Crying baby

The definition of “microaggressions” are as vague as the line between Kim Jong Un’s neck and chin. As ambiguous as the purpose behind the infamous p*ssy hat. Or Amy Schumer.

This professor claims concern for students in confrontational situations. But rather than help them become adults, she treats them with the delicateness of defenseless premature kittens. Hidden in a room with juice boxes. Crayons. A rattle made with birth control pills.

Notice also her subtle racism. Only “students of color” need to be coddled? So she thinks they’re not as mentally equipped as non-colored people? This is better known as the “soft bigotry of low expectations.” The professor expects white students to carry on. But “students of color” need a security blanket.

that's racist gif

Have you gotten your therapist recommended daily laughs? Behold, more college cry-babies:

NOT SUBSCRIBED TO THE PODCAST? FIX THAT! IT'S COMPLETELY FREE ON BOTH ITUNES HERE AND SOUNDCLOUD HERE.

Kim Jong Un Botches Missile Launch, Lands Large Bomb in North Korean City

Posted: 04 Jan 2018 08:42 AM PST

North Korea Failed Missile Launch

There is nothing a certain pudding-stuffed child won’t do. Claim to be a snow god? Check. Ban Mother’s Day? Check. Outlaw singing and drinking? Check. Now the volatile North Korean leader botched a missile launch, hitting one of his own cities.

North Korea conducted its third test of the previously-unseen Hwasong-12 IRBM, an impressive weapon that served as a stepping stone in the development of a longer-range missile able to range the U.S. mainland, on April 28, 2017. The missile fell out of the sky over North Korean territory after its first-stage engines failed after about a minute of powered flight…

As the liquid-fueled missile did not, according to U.S. government sources, explode in flight, there is reason to believe that the missile exploded when it slammed into the earth, causing considerable damage.

What makes this type of failure alarming is that after a successful lofted test of the Hwasong-12 in May, North Korea proceeded to fire its new weapon out of the populated capital city of Pyongyang and over Japan into the Pacific Ocean.

Shorter: Kim Jong Un just bombed himself. Proving Trump right: Trump’s nuke button actually works.

The White House’s warnings of the dangers of Kim Jong Un and the heart risks of his dad bod are correct. One doesn’t need to understand physics to know shooting an engine-powered projectile over a largely populated city could spell disaster. Especially if the rocket was programmed by malnourished, communist drones simply working off the orders of a pocket-sized megalomaniac.

Next time maybe Kim Jong Un should stick to dropping Acme anvils from propellered planes. Or perhaps he should trade in his nuclear program for giant sling-shots. From which he can fire stink bombs. Just so long as he places the slingshots on the DMZ, and lessens the risk he’ll bomb his own country again.

Oh to be a fly on Trump’s wall.

NOT SUBSCRIBED TO THE PODCAST? FIX THAT! IT'S COMPLETELY FREE ON BOTH ITUNES HERE AND SOUNDCLOUD HERE.

Andrew Cuomo is Suing to Block You from Getting a Tax Cut

Posted: 04 Jan 2018 07:56 AM PST

Andrew Cuomo

You know the tax cut you’re getting? The one even the left has to admit is real and spectacular (see Bernie Sanders Admits Tax Cuts are a Good Thing and Media Asks if GOP Tax Cuts Help 3 American Families)? New York Governor Andrew Cuomo is planning to sue to have it taken away from you. All of you. Not just you sad saps in New York.

He’s basically launching his soon to be failed presidential campaign on it. While he taps you. ALL OF YOU!

New York state will take Washington to court to challenge the new Republican tax overhaul, Democratic Gov. Andrew Cuomo said Wednesday, calling the new law an unconstitutional assault on states’ rights and New York in particular. The lawsuit is one of several ways Cuomo, a potential 2020 presidential contender, is positioning New York to lead the opposition to President Donald Trump and Congressional Republicans.

The new tax law caps a deduction for state and local taxes at $10,000, a move that will increase federal tax liabilities for many homeowners in high-tax states like New York. Cuomo says the change could increase tax liabilities for some New Yorkers by as much as 25 percent, potentially prompting some to leave for cheaper states and making the state less competitive economically.

All this time, we thought Chris Cuomo was the idiot brother. To be the parents of these invertebrates…

Here’s the rub. People are fleeing New York like Jacob to freedom. The state is losing at least one congressional seat, to pair with the two NY lost after the 2010 census. They’re leaving New York because of the painful, grinding rape that is taxes. Every April, New Yorkers just hand their accountants jars of vaseline and ask that they just don't make eye contact.

Now take what happens to New Yorkers and scale it up by 300 million.

The Governor since 2010 has been glittering dumbass Andrew Cuomo (with more Democrats before that). Meaning the Democrats have been gang-raping taxpayers for a long, long, long time.

The people who are seeing their taxes “go up,” according to the Empire Center: it’s a relatively small number of (mainly very high income) filers who now pay a disproportionately large share of state taxes. Nothing fair about a small percentage of people paying a large share of taxes. Who is the Governor responsible for that: Andrew Cuomo or Donald Trump?

To repeat: the biggest losers from federal tax reform are not middle-class families in general but a small number of very high-earners, mainly the income millionaires who have been Albany's cash cows.

So we’re clear, we need to rein in spending before even considering raising taxes on anyone. Show me a clear audit the tax pool is being spent the best way it can before asking anyone for more money. I’ll wait.

However, when people like Andrew Cuomo lie and say they are “for the middle class,” remember this story. Because basically, Chris’ Idiot Brother spent the last eight years funding his progressive resume – for his soon to be failed presidential campaign – on the backs of New York taxpayers. Now that it’s hard for him to do that, he has a case of the sads. Proving rape is an empty act.

NOT SUBSCRIBED TO THE PODCAST? FIX THAT! IT'S COMPLETELY FREE ON BOTH ITUNES HERE AND SOUNDCLOUD HERE.