--> -->
Zicutake USA Comment | Search Articles

#History (Education) #Satellite report #Arkansas #Tech #Poker #Language and Life #Critics Cinema #Scientific #Hollywood #Future #Conspiracy #Curiosity #Washington
 Smiley face
 SYFY TV online Free


[Calculate SHA256 hash]
 Smiley face
Zicutake BROWSER
 Smiley face Encryption Text and HTML
Aspect Ratio Calculator
[HTML color codes]
 Smiley face Conversion to JavaScript
[download YouTube videos in MP4, FLV, 3GP, and many more formats]

 Smiley face Mining Satoshi | Payment speed

 Smiley face
Online BitTorrent Magnet Link Generator


#Funny News

#Funny News

Tucker Carlson Takes Pro-Hijab Feminist to Task Over Her Hypocrisy…

Posted: 09 Feb 2018 03:36 AM PST

Feminism has become an odd mishmash of leftist causes. It used to be a movement about getting women on equal footing with men. Now, it involves income inequality, black lives mattering, and sticking it to Israel. Oh yeah, let’s not forget furthering the glorious cause of Allah. Because nothing says female empowerment like endorsing a religion that won’t let women leave the house without a chaperone.

Macys is selling hijabs now. A move which feminists emphatically approve. Tucker Carlson had a feminist on to discuss, and it was just as absurd as you would imagine:

Fox News' Tucker Carlson had a stunning interview Thursday with Sonia Ossorio of the National Organization for Women over hijabs being sold at Macy's.

"I'll tell you what's a big part of women's liberation, is making sure that the Trump administration does not roll back our rights to full reproductive healthcare," Ossorio claimed.

"Oh, right, abortion, right," Tucker said.

"I go to work every day to think about how to close the wage gap," Ossorio said.

The Daily Caller co-founder said, "I'm starting to think maybe you care more about identity politics than women. I'm just throwing that out there. I mean, if you're endorsing the hijab, maybe it's not really about women, has that occurred to you?"

So, even though hijabs are a symbol of female inferiority, feminists are jumping on the bandwagon and covering themselves like leftovers from last night’s dinner. Makes sense, right?


The feminists are so eagerly making hijabs a symbol of their cause. But, this is a religion that doles out death sentences for vagina-havers who get behind the wheel, mind you. So forgive me if this alliance comes across as batsh*t crazy a tad out of place. As the Tuck stated, these feminists seem more preoccupied with staying at the forefront of identity politics than actually empowering the lady folk.

So long as the Muhammad fangirls keep forcing their ladies to wrap themselves like mummies, they won’t be a “progressive” religion. No matter how hard the left tries to make it so.

Speaking of that:


NBC Labels Old Russia Story as ‘Breaking,’ Causes Media Frenzy

Posted: 08 Feb 2018 05:48 PM PST

NBC Fake News on Russia

Tiptoeing. Conniving. Accents thick with deception. I’m not describing Russia. I’m describing major news networks and their sly ways. Spinning a web of fake news thicker than the thighs of body positive behemoths (see Reporters Spread Fake News Claiming Ivanka Kicked a Spanish Chef From a Restaurant and Fake News Says Melania Orders the Death of Historic Tree. Actually, the Tree is Dying and Dangerous…).

Exhibit Q: NBC reported an old, stale story as if it was a newly hatched chicken. Fake newsies.

Social media and fellow outlets ate it up like a depressed gay with a tub of Ben and Jerry’s. How unfortunate for them. Turns out this is an old, wrinkled story. Take a peek below to see the article as it was featured in ABC news. In 2016.

I can only see two major differences between these articles:

  • 2016 article said 20 states were attempted breaches, only four successful
  • 2018 article said 21 states were attempted breaches, didn’t specify which ones were successful

Also, the old article was filled with less stink than the new article. That’s all. There has to be some form of plagiarism here, even if it’s plagiarism of disgrace. Handed back and forth between networks each week.

Credit where credit’s due: it’s the first time NBC interviewed a confirmed “high-level official” on the matter. So, maybe they thought they could get away with the old reporting. Just to get more than 27,000 likes.

Journalism abides by its own rules. The lines are more blurred than the words between fifty shades of CNN red.

Major networks try to make old news more exciting with punctuations of “JUST IN!” or “BREAKING!” or “DEVELOPING!” Viewers are beginning to hear their sneaking deception. It’s as if the media is tiptoeing with cleats over bubble wrap. Zero grace.

When it comes to news no-nos, CNN is a frequent offender. Suffer through their news cycle with us below.


[Video] Rape Survivor Gives Compelling Reason Why #MeToo Should Include Gun Rights

Posted: 08 Feb 2018 05:08 PM PST

When it comes to the #MeToo campaign, we’ve seen stupid aplenty (see Rose McGowan BLASTS Alyssa Milano’s #MeToo Hypocrisy and #MeToo Fail: Even the NYT is Defending Aziz Ansari). But it’s not just lacking in common sense, truthfulness, or due process. The movement has sidestepped any real solution to keeping women safe. You know, beyond “men are scumbags!” There’s little concern voiced for how girls should defend themselves from rapists. Sorry ladies. Throw your p*ssy hat on and hope for the best.

This woman is hoping to change that. Watch below:

For Lindquist, who grew up around guns, she said the best way to defend herself would have been to use her pistol, but because of Temple’s policies prohibiting concealed carry on campus, she didn’t have her gun.

“As things started to get a little more violent, I knew that I had no way to defend myself,” She said. “I couldn’t carry, I didn’t have my gun. My gun was unloaded and locked in my gun cabinet.”

“I think the #MeToo movement and the movement for women’s right to self defense or really anyone’s right to self defense, they sort of go hand-in-hand,” Lindquist said.

“…It seems like right now the #MeToo movement is all about just having women’s autonomy and being able to make these decisions and say, ‘This is what happened to me, but I’m gonna get through this, and I’m strong, and I know who I am,’ and that sort of understanding, but it seems sort of like it’s stopping there, that everyone is like … The award show that was a few nights ago, we saw people wearing the Time’s Up pins. It’s like, ‘Okay, well that’s great, but what are you doing?’ You’re not doing anything to actually fix the problem, and that’s sort of what I’m trying to do here,” Lindquist said.

She has a point. To hear leftists squawk it, the safety of women depends entirely on men. Men are the ones who need to check their privilege (see New #SJW College Posters Say Nearly All Men Guilty of… Rape?). And it is true that men shouldn’t be violent crackpots. Chalk it up to basic human decency 101.

But women (and men) should also take it upon themselves to have a line of self defense. You know, beyond being a boss b*tch who don’t need no man. Armpit hair does not count as self defense, girls. Ungodly amounts of body hair may turn off potential mates, but turns out the same doesn’t apply to potential rapists. They have no qualms about inviting themselves to stroll in your untended garden.

Self defense. It’s needed. You’d think this something feminists would root for. They could encourage women to buy guns, offer self defense classes, educate victims on protection.

Instead they shat out a hashtag.


Elementary Principal Demands His Students Make Changes as He Transitions

Posted: 08 Feb 2018 03:06 PM PST

Principal Transistions in Front of Students

Welcome to McFeels Elementary School. Where children are encouraged to do math according to their mood. 6+100=4. Because it feels correct. Cat is spelled Kot, because words are hard (see Letting Children Transition is Child Abuse Says American College of Pediatricians and CHILD ABUSE: Daycare Worker FORCES 4-Year-Old-Boys to Kiss Each Other).

McFeels doesn’t really exist, but it won’t be long before it does if this principal has his/her way. He’s currently transitioning in front of children. It’s like a long, hard to watch magic trick. Here’s a glimpse of the letter he sent to parents.

"I have never felt completely happy or at peace. I got to the point that I thought I would never be able to reveal my true self. Frankly, the prospect of doing so was terrifying. That has changed. I  sincerely believe that the ability to live my life openly and authentically gives me great serenity and will make me a more sensitive, empathetic, and effective leader."

Daniels said in the letter, dated Tuesday, that as she nurtures her new identity, she will "most likely be presenting myself differently." Daniels asked that students refer to her as Principal Daniels but said the pronouns "she," "he," and "they" are acceptable to use.

Yikes. A bit drastic of a change to hit little ones with. Here are some suggestions Principal Daniels gave to parents to answer children’s questions:

  • People express themselves in many ways and it is important that we accept them as they are
  • Principal Daniels identifies as both a male and a female, but over time will look more like a female
  • Principal Daniels is the same caring person who wants the best for every Stanley student.
  • We all deserve to be able to live as the genuine person we feel like inside

This principle has been “feeling” like this for years. He also says living trans is a private decision. In that line of thinking, it should also be a very private transition. One wherein little kiddos don’t have to learn about sex changes in between their ABC’s and 123’s.

Choosing to be a miserable man-lady instead of just a miserable man is well within his rights. This is America, after all. But things start getting fuzzy when people force other to abide by their version of reality (see There’s Now Transgender Nesting Dolls to ‘Educate’ Children). Luckily, Principal Daniels is only changing his/her/their first name as to not confuse the younglings. Because that’s the part which will be confusing.

The school is making its stance on the matter very clear.

A separate letter to parents sent from Superintendent Pamela Angelakis applauded Daniels for her "courage, honesty, and transparency" as she publicly embraces this "profound life change."

"As pointed out in [Daniels's] letter, getting to the point of being willing to share those feelings has been a long and challenging process," Angelakis said. "I hope you will join me and the entire district leadership team in offering Principal Daniels our acceptance, understanding, and support."

A more practical choice for Mr. Daniels would have been transitioning earlier. Not having to make a huge scene with letters sent home to every child’s family. He could have made his change silently. Or quietly stepped down to fulfill his “true self” away from kiddos. There shouldn’t be school officials imploring parents and children to accommodate his needs. It should be the other way around. Children come first.

Forcing tiny tots to become aware of transgenderness, sex changes, and mismatched genitalia is completely inappropriate. And downright creepy. Like this 52-year-old “child:”



The Democratic Coalition Against Trump Gave 90% of Money to Themselves

Posted: 08 Feb 2018 12:51 PM PST

Democratic Coalition Misappropriates Funds

In today’s liberal implosion news: one of the Democrats’ beloved coalitions scammed tons of blessed greenery from fellow leftists. It’s not the first time Democrats have grossly misappropriated funds. And it surely isn’t the last time they’ll be gross (see Feminist Linda Sarsour Exploits Hurricane Victims to Raise Funds for Political Activism and Man of the People? Bernie Sanders Caught Red Handed Funneling Campaign Funds…).

The coalition used 90% of the funds to pay themselves, but not for another Pelosi facelift. Shame.

The Democratic Coalition, one of the many new progressive-minded organizations to bloom in the age of anti-Trump fervor, brought in nearly half a million dollars last year. Its donors include Siddiqui, a pair of Hollywood television producers, a former Real Housewife of Miami, and a member of the U.S. Broadcasting Board of Governors. The vast majority of its funds, however, have come from people whose names don't make it into Federal Election Commission disclosures: the small, "unitemized" donors who give $200 or less.

The breakdown in 2016, when the Democratic Coalition declared its goal was "making sure that Donald Trump never became President," was even starker. That year, Dworkin and other staff members received more than 90 percent of all of the Democratic Coalition's expenditures, either personally or through a consulting company, according to FEC records.

So the majority of that money went into someone’s pocket. Not where the donors thought it would go. Maybe they at least funded one or two leftist scream-at-the-sky sessions (see Leftists Protest Election of Donald Trump by Screaming at the Clouds).

Another major loss was using donors’ money to pay for the legal fees of a libel suit against the coalition.

The case was settled last summer under undisclosed terms. But the Democratic Coalition never informed current or prospective donors that their contributions would help cover what have turned out to be six-figure legal expenses.

Too bad this scam was only presented now, not earlier. It would have provided more ammunition for Hillary’s book “What Happened (To Our Reputation).” Ah well. You lose some, you lose some.

This financial betrayal is yet another glowing example of Democratic hypocrisy (see Socialist Heroes Bernie Sanders, Jane Sanders Under FBI Investigation… for Bank Fraud). The left claims to be honest, virtuous, and compassionate for one another. Turns out their only compassionate about what’s in their wallet. Instead of owning up to funds being bequeathed to the wrong heirs, they continue with the virtue signaling. Instead of uniting, they continue the pathetic infighting and lack of leadership. Poor babies.

Shouldn’t be all that surprising the Democratic Coalition failed miserably. Democratic anything doesn’t work, especially when joined with socialism:


Nancy Pelosi’s “Magic Minute” Stunt Has Democrats Scared

Posted: 08 Feb 2018 09:58 AM PST

This is why I call Nancy Pelosi the greatest Democrat leader who has ever lived. Shutdown Schumer saw what happened when you shutdown the government over illegal immigrants (see Mainstream Media Outlets Surprisingly Tell the Truth About the Shutdown and Ben Shapiro on Government Shutdown: Schumer is a Loser). He learned his lesson. Nancy Pelosi saw that as a challenge. She countered with an eight hour “magic minute.” A “magic minute” is the House’s version of the filibuster. Also known as a cheap political stunt.

harry potter

Though not all Democrats are amused. There are some sane ones who think embracing illegals as the most important part of the Democrat coalition this week is a bad idea. All this, after Speaker Crumbs continues to rail against the middle class getting a tax cut. Again, the greatest Democrat leader who has ever lived.

Some Dems are starting to leak. Also, they are saying things anonymously to reporters.

We actually have footage of the meeting this anonymous Democrat came from:

monty python

This is why people like me, who are Trump agnostics at best, don’t sweat him all that much. As turbulent as he can be, the Democrats always go eleventy times overboard. If Trump’s ego would allow it, he could just not speak for the next eight months. Let leftists continue to do leftist things.  Leave the Democrat party to eat themselves. Especially when anyone dares challenge Pelosi’s leadership.

The left seems intent on screwing things up themselves.


Watch: Plus Size Model Upset that Doctor Suggested Losing Weight

Posted: 08 Feb 2018 09:39 AM PST

Alexandra Thomas is a plus size blogger. But she’s so much more than that; she’s also a sensitive whiner. She was so traumatized by a dermatologist suggesting another doctor could help with her weight, she ran to her iPhone to let everyone know.

I normally don’t sweat videos like this. The same way a plus size model might sweat having to walk up stairs. It’s a new thing on the left to celebrate unhealthy behavior (see Princeton to Hold a 'Fat Positivity' Dinner for Obese Students… and Government Blows Tax Dollars on Study to Promote Fat Acceptance). But I don’t live her life.

Plus there’s a size 16 hole where context should be. A dermatologist making unsolicited comments on someone’s weight seems a tad odd. But the story is getting national attention, with reporters accusing the doctor of “fat shaming.”

Are we really at a point where it’s fat-shaming for a doctor to suggest to a fat person, “you might want to drop a few pounds?” Because like I said, there’s a lot of missing context. For instance, mayhaps being overweight could be a cause for whatever sent Thomas to the dermatologist in the first place. That’s not fat-shaming. That’s you have a problem with X, Y might be causing it, so do something about Y and it could fix X.

I wasn’t in the room. I don’t know what was discussed. But it’s alarming how fast society jumps to blaming a doctor for expressing concern about a patients weight. Just because that person decided to cry on YouTube.

Fat isn’t healthy. Doctors have a vested interest in health. It’s not rocket science.


John Oliver Dunks on Pelosi: Who Wants To Hear Her Talk for Seven Hours?

Posted: 08 Feb 2018 08:05 AM PST

In case you missed it yesterday, Nancytron 3000 yapped on for eight hours (see WATCH: Dem. Representative Falls Asleep on Camera During Pelosi's Eight Hour Long Speech). While some were sleeping through Nancy Pelosi’s magic minute, Stephen Colbert was taping a show with John Oliver. The greatest Democrat leader who has ever lived came up in conversation. I think Colbert was expecting his guest to be supportive of her. Instead, John Oliver wondered what many of us thought of her decrepitness as well:

I'm not sure deep down you know for sure if or what you're applauding there. 'Oh, she talked for seven hours.' That sounds like an endurance effort to do and to listen to, to some extent. I don't know if anyone wants to hear Nancy Pelosi speak about anything for seven hours," Oliver said. "If she read the Harry Potter audiobook, we'd have no movies right now! That's what I'm saying.

Personally speaking, I’d rather get waterboarded than listen to Nancy Pelosi speak for eight hours. Or watch CNN for 16 hours straight. Ten minutes of Nancy Pelosi blathering on makes me want to bleach my ears.

Of course after the 2:20 mark they went into the usual anti-Trumpfest. You could watch if you haven’t filled your weekly quota yet.

Or, you can enjoy political humor that is actually funny:


Uranium One Informant Testifies Against Hillary and Obama

Posted: 08 Feb 2018 05:56 AM PST

Uranium One

There’s been a new development in the Russia scandal. No, not the Trump collusion case. Which may turn in to the Trump obstruction of justice case. Which may wind up not even being that. What we’re talking about here is Uranium One (see FBI Informant in Obama/Russian Uranium Scandal Cleared to Testify and Trump Fires Back Over Clinton and Obama Uranium Deal).

Well, the informant has dropped his dime.

An FBI informant connected to the Uranium One controversy told three congressional committees in written testimony that Moscow routed millions of dollars to America with the expectation it would be used to benefit Bill Clinton’s charitable efforts while Secretary of State Hillary Clinton quarterbacked a "reset" in US-Russian relations.

The informant, Douglas Campbell, said in the testimony obtained by The Hill that he was told by Russian nuclear executives that Moscow had hired the American lobbying firm APCO Worldwide specifically because it was in position to influence the Obama administration, and more specifically Hillary Clinton.

Campbell said Russian nuclear officials "told me at various times that they expected APCO to apply a portion of the $3 million annual lobbying fee it was receiving from the Russians to provide in-kind support for the Clinton's Global Initiative," he added in the testimony.

"The contract called for four payments of $750,000 over twelve months. APCO was expected to give assistance free of charge to the Clinton Global Initiative as part of their effort to create a favorable environment to ensure the Obama administration made affirmative decisions on everything from Uranium One to the U.S.-Russia Civilian Nuclear Cooperation agreement. "

Hopefully Campbell has himself some good security. They say that snitches get stitches. Though people who cross the Clintons have a habit of getting rather dead.

michael scott I'll kill you

So let’s see where this goes. As of this writing, Donald Trump isn’t awake and hasn’t started live tweeting Fox and Friends yet in his pajamas. The Hillary and Obama fanbois haven’t started calling this all racist sexism. Or even sexist racism. But from my view in the cheap seats, this reads pretty shady. At least as shady as some of the Trump/Russia/Election 2016 public details. If not more so, because in the later case there’s yet to be a believable connect between Russia and the Donald Trump.

The Uranium One testimony at least draws a clear connection to the Obama Administration and the Clinton Foundation. How ironic that all this time the left has been desperately searching for a Russia scandal, yet the only Russia scandal there seems to be surrounds their precious Hillary and Barackness.