Posted: 26 Feb 2018 04:30 AM PST
In his Metamorphoses, Ovid is retelling episodes from Virgil’s Aeneid, in which the hero Aeneas has reached the coast midway between Naples and Rome, at Caieta (Gaeta). There he went ashore, and two of the survivors of Ulysses’ crew meet to tell stories from Homer’s Odyssey. In the previous article, Achaemenides gave an account of Ulysses’ encounter with the Cyclops Polyphemus; next, Macareus tells his story of transformation by the sorceress Circe.
Following Achaemenides’ account of the encounter with Polyphemus, he hands over narration to Macareus, who provides some details from later parts of the Odyssey.
Macareus first tells of Aeolus, and the bag of winds which he gave to Ulysses/Odysseus. For nine days, Ulysses and his crew experienced favourable winds, but on the tenth day the crew opened the bag, in search of riches. They released the winds, which promptly blew the ship back to Aeolus.
Then there were the cannibal Laestrygonians, who ate one of the three crew sent to meet them. Their chieftain led a party in pursuit of Ulysses, bombarding his ships with trees and rocks and sinking two of the three. That allowed just one ship, containing Ulysses, Macareus and others, to escape to safety.
They then sailed to Circe’s island, where given their recent experiences the surviving crew refused to go beyond its beach. Lots were drawn to form a group to go to Circe’s palace, and they set off. On the way they came across enchanted animals, lions, bears and wolves, which rushed at them but did not attack.
Macareus and his party were taken in to see Circe sat on her throne. She was busy making a herbal concoction, and arranged for Ulysses’ men to be served with a barley drink, into which she poured her concoction:
Only one, Eurylochus, had refused to drink and remained in human form instead of being transformed into a pig. He warned Ulysses, who came to Circe bearing a flower which he had been given by Mercury. Circe took Ulysses into her hall, where she tried to lure him to drink her concoction. He drew his sword, and forced her to back off.
Circe and Ulysses then married, and she took him off to her bed. As a wedding gift to him, she transformed his crew back into human form, to their great relief and gratitude. Ulysses and his crew stayed on Circe’s island for a whole year before resuming their journey.
Circe has been painted extensively since the Renaissance, right up to modern times, and a fair proportion of those works have shown the transformation of Ulysses’ men into pigs, and Ulysses’ meeting with Circe. Here is my selection of the best.
Jan van Bijlert’s Ulysses and Circe from around 1640 shows the couple at the banquet, looking intently at one another. Circe holds her wand, and between them is the goblet containing her magic concoction.
At the right, one of the serving maids looks directly at the viewer. At her heels are Ulysses’ crew, in the form of pigs.
Salomon de Bray makes this a more intimate meeting, in his slightly later Odysseus and Circe (1650-55). Here it is Ulysses who is seated, clutching a krater-like goblet into which a maid is pouring clear liquid from a bottle. The hero looks quite haggard, and decidedly unimpressed by Circe. Below Ulysses’ left arm, two pigs are drinking more of Circe’s concoction.
Giovanni Andrea Sirani, the father and teacher of the great Elisabetta Sirani, painted his account of Ulysses and Circe at about the same time as de Bray, and advances the story a few moments to the point where Ulysses is about to draw his sword. Here Circe is still holding the glass which she is trying to get him to drink from, with her wand in the other hand.
The crew are seen in the background, in the form of pigs. Another woman holding a wand is with them: this could represent their transformation into pigs, or back into humans, which would form multiplex narrative.
The last of the paintings from this period of popularity is Matthijs Naiveu’s Circe and Odysseus from 1702. This is set in a grand banquet inside Circe’s palace, with some peculiar clusters of figures which allude to Circe’s role as a sorceress. For example, there is a table just to the left of the couple at which a satyr and a demon are engaged in conversation.
Circe has moved forward from her throne to embrace Ulysses, whose sword is pointing at her body to force her back. The goblet from which she has been trying to get him to drink is held by a maid at the far right. A couple of boars are feeding from fruit laid on the marble floor.
The story then seems to have lost its popularity with painters, until the end of the nineteenth century. Although Gustave Moreau painted one work which shows Circe, it was John William Waterhouse who developed a sophisticated account.
Waterhouse’s Circe Offering the Cup to Odysseus from 1891 is perhaps the most complex work showing this story. Circe sits on her throne, holding up the krater for Ulysses to drink, and her wand in the other hand. The viewer is Ulysses, seen in the large circular mirror behind the sorceress, preparing to draw his sword.
On the left side of the mirror is Ulysses’ ship, and scattered on the ground at Circe’s feet are the herbs and berries which she used to prepare the concoction with which she transformed the crew. To the right, one of those pigs lies on the ground, behind a small incense burner.
Waterhouse has not only told the story using the ingenious confluence of objects, but encourages the viewer to consider their role in his painting, and more profoundly about the action of looking, and the image.
Briton Rivière’s rather simpler painting of Circe and her Swine (before 1896) has been used as an illustration for several versions of the Odyssey, and unusually casts Circe as a magic swineherd, her wand resting behind her.
Finally, Alice Pike Barney’s very painterly portrait of Circe from about 1915 was most probably made in pastels. Her streaming golden hair almost fills the painting, and wraps the head of a large boar which she is embracing. I apologise for the poor image quality here, which is the best that I have been able to locate.
Although not apparently tackled by many of the Masters of narrative painting, this fascinating myth from the Odyssey has been well-told, and Waterhouse’s account stands out as a major work of the nineteenth century.
The English translation of Ovid above is taken from Ovid. Metamorphoses. Tr. Brookes More. Boston. Cornhill Publishing Co. 1922, at Perseus. I am very grateful to Perseus at Tufts for this.
Posted: 25 Feb 2018 11:30 PM PST
Recently, I’ve had a spate of secure web connections (using HTTPS) which have failed. I’ve entered, pasted or linked to what should be a secure website, only to see Safari complaining that something is wrong.
In this case, the certificate expired the previous day. It’s very tempting just to click on the link to visit the website, but you should never do that. Pause for a few moments to make a careful decision, rather than rushing ahead.
What makes secure websites different is that your browser connects to them using more secure HTTPS protocols with encryption. This should make them better-trusted, so you can have reasonable confidence that downloading software from them won’t deliver malware, and that you can provide sensitive information such as passwords, and exchange data such as bank account details securely.
Before any of that can happen, the server has to establish a basis of trust, which relies on its security certificate. So in the opening stages of making the connection, your browser checks the server’s certificate.
Lots of things can be amiss. In this case, the security certificate had expired the day before. In another failed connection, the certificate was for a slightly different web address, not the one for which it was being used. The moment that you see this report in your browser, you should stop clicking on things automatically, and start paying very close attention. If you can’t do that just now, the safest thing to do is back off and leave it until you can.
Malicious websites and malware are almost invariably designed to exploit human weaknesses. It’s all too easy to think that it’s fine to download an update from a site whose certificate only expired yesterday, and that might be exactly what an attacker wants. Their job is to lure you to them with all your defences down – and many of them are very skilled at doing just that.
As this warning points out, it’s quite possible that certificate is still valid, and that your Mac just thinks the date is later than it really is. With most system clocks set against internet time servers, that is now quite unusual, but worth a quick check.
More important is checking that the web address is absolutely correct. The warning here tells you the address that your browser is trying to connect to. Are you sure that it shouldn’t be something slightly different? Are all the characters normal and regular, or might some of them be Unicode spoofs? Is the end of the address really .com, or should it be .co or something different? If you have any doubts, back off and get the address right before going any further.
When you’re confident that the site is absolutely correct, you next have to think about risk. If you’re just going to view that site to find something out, and don’t intend downloading anything, that doesn’t make it safe. If the site is malicious, it could still trick you into doing something that you’ll regret – every link should be treated as potentially dangerous. It’s still best not to go there, but if you really need that information now, you might be able to proceed with great caution.
If you were going there with the intention of downloading software or an update, just don’t. You may have an anti-virus scanner active, but that will only detect the malware that it already knows about. If this site is just about to serve you the latest and as-yet unreported Trojan for your Mac, you probably won’t receive any warning. Neither will the security tools built into macOS, such as XProtect and MRT, protect you. Chances are that any malware will be signed using a valid developer certificate, so will pass Gatekeeper’s checks, at least until it has been detected and that signature revoked by Apple.
When it comes to malware, you really don’t want to be an early adopter.
There are some things that you can think about doing. You can always click on the link to view the security certificate, although that won’t normally help you make a decision. In this case, it shows what appears to have been a valid certificate, which did expire on the previous day. You might recognise that the certificate traces back to a Root Certificate which looks suspicious, but for most users viewing the certificate isn’t likely to contribute a great deal.
If you’re just after information, you may be able to get that from the plain HTTP site. This might seem to be heading in the wrong direction, but your browser should alert you to any potential disclosure made over an insecure connection, which it would let pass when the connection is secure. In one case, I wanted to view a page on a blog for which I had a secure address which failed; entering the plain HTTP version of the site worked fine, and proved genuine.
But if you’re looking for an update or download, none of these is going to get you very far without putting your Mac at significant risk. The best thing is to email the site’s support address and inform them of the problem. Wait until they get back to you before doing anything further. But don’t enter the website to complete a contact form there: if you can’t use a regular email address, try addressing a tweet to them, perhaps.
Whatever you do, never get pressured in compromising your Mac’s security. That is one of the human weaknesses that attackers use most successfully of all: our lack of patience.
|You are subscribed to email updates from The Eclectic Light Company. |
To stop receiving these emails, you may unsubscribe now.
|Email delivery powered by Google|
|Google, 1600 Amphitheatre Parkway, Mountain View, CA 94043, United States|