Posted: 23 Apr 2018 05:11 AM PDT
Especially so-called feminist women should listen!
Do not miss this interview of former refugee Mona Walter by Natalia Osten-Sacken at Gatestone Institute.
I’ve snipped just a bit of the interview, but the entire discussion is riveting. See what she says about the moral equivalency the Pope has been promoting!
What solution do you see for Sweden and Europe? We cannot forbid the practice of any religion, even the most radical one; we have freedom of religion.
No, we cannot prohibit it, but we must understand that Islam is not a religion, it is a totalitarian system. We cannot treat it like any other religious faith. It forbids all other religions, freedom of speech, freedom of individual choice. It is the opposite of democracy. We must openly and honestly analyze this ideology, we must understand it.
We must not listen to the media: that Islam is a religion of peace. Do you know what it means? It means that peace will not prevail until people accept Islam as their religion. Peace will come when there will be no resistance and Islam and Sharia will dominate. Islam divides humanity into two “houses”: a house of peace and a house of war. All of us, infidels and even liberal Muslims who do not accept sharia, are in the house of war.
Are there Muslims who integrate, do not want to introduce Sharia, and so on?
Remember — we must separate Islam and sharia law from Muslims, because many of them are peaceful people and we cannot mix these two together. This is always mainstream media: if I speak about Islam, they interpret it as hating Muslims. But I do not hate Muslims. I believe that this ideology is dangerous for all mankind. The Muslim community will also suffer under the Sharia.
As a convert to Christianity, how would you rate the behavior of the Catholic Church, which recommends greater openness to immigration?
I heard the Pope preaching this and I was very disappointed — because Islam and Christianity cannot be compared. Christians must imitate Jesus who preached love and mercy, even to his enemies; treating others as you would like to be treated.
Meanwhile, Islam, and especially the Islamic State, do exactly what Muhammad did. And he let his followers kill and take wives as sex slaves. We cannot compare these two worlds. Again, I do not mean Christians and Muslims, but their ideologies are mismatched.
The creator of this ideology was a criminal, a warlord who said that killing people brings glory. How can we open borders for such an ideology? As we do not know who is coming to us, we must be very careful, especially since we see what happened to Christians in Muslim countries. I do not understand the attitude of the Pope and the Catholic Church, who should care primarily about their members.
The Pope is no longer a Christian leader, but a politician and activist of human rights. He is no longer the head of the Church working for the good of Christianity and I do not see him as my guide. What I see when I look at him is a leftist politician. Jesus said we should love our enemies, but not that we should be stupid.
Much more of the Mona Walter interview here!
See my ‘Invasion of Europe’ archive. I’ve predicted for years that of all the countries of Europe, Sweden would fall to Islamic supremacism first.
My Sweden archive is here.
You might also want to revisit my post last month about how the number of ex-Muslims in the US is rising.
Posted: 23 Apr 2018 04:22 AM PDT
This case filed in a California court (where else!) comes on the eve of the US Supreme Court hearing on the so-called Trump Muslim ban case scheduled to be heard this Wednesday.
See Reuters here for: Trump’s travel ban faces U.S. Supreme Court showdown.
Following is the news about the DHS/DOJ report that accompanied the ban and the case filed in California attempting to force the feds to withdraw the report.
Muslim Advocates seek retraction of inflammatory report released by federal government
LOS ANGELES – Attorneys for Muslim Advocates recently filed a lawsuit with the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California against the United States departments of Justice and Homeland Security regarding a recent report they claim is another step in President Donald Trump's" anti-Muslim and anti-immigrant agenda.”
"If left uncorrected, the report is likely to contribute to this increase in violence and stigmatization experienced by Muslim communities,” reads an excerpt from the complaint.
The plaintiffs claim the report does not comply with the Information Quality and the Administrative Procedure acts because it "misrepresents the threat that immigrants, especially Muslim immigrants, pose to the United States." The group wants the report retracted.
At this point in your reading, you might be asking: what is this report and where can I find it! (Why not link to it in this news story?) You can find it here. Probably best to download it before they can force its withdrawal.
Muslim Advocates, a civil rights organization, works to fight stereotypes about Muslim and ensure that national laws are not discriminatory toward Muslims. The Muslim Advocates claim that the recently released report, which was published in an executive order, includes Trump's second attempt to ban Muslims from entering America.
The complaint alleges that the report is filled with misleading and incorrect information and will have significant impacts by perpetuating a stigma against Muslim that could lead to more of the violence against Muslims. The group claims the increase in violence against Muslims began when Trump began his presidency.
The complaint states that the report calls to end visas for families to reunite and "manipulates information to support its anti-immigrant and anti-Muslim conclusions,” such as allegedly using irrelevant and debunked studies on violence toward women and analyzing terrorism incidents done by foreign-born Americans.
“The Trump Administration has used the report to justify its sweeping ban on the entry of nationals from six Muslim-majority countries into the United States,” the plaintiffs said.
The Muslim Advocates are suing for the DOJ and DHS to stop distribution of the report, and for the court to find the report fails to meet the guidelines of fair and objective information. The group also seeks declaratory and injunctive relief in the form of attorneys' fees and related costs.
Read the whole report from the Northern California Record by clicking here.
See my category Supreme Court here with previous posts on the Trump executive orders.
|You are subscribed to email updates from Refugee Resettlement Watch. |
To stop receiving these emails, you may unsubscribe now.
|Email delivery powered by Google|
|Google, 1600 Amphitheatre Parkway, Mountain View, CA 94043, United States|